Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the efforts on the document. I think most of my comments have already been mentioned by my fellow ADs. I have got one in addition - * Section 2.3 : says -- o Permit this IPv6 EH or IPv6 Option type. o Discard (and log) packets containing this IPv6 EH or option type. o Reject (and log) packets containing this IPv6 EH or option type (where the packet drop is signaled with an ICMPv6 error message). I believe logs are mentioned here for a good reason but I haven't seen any mention of logging in any of the Operational and Interoperability Impact sub sections. I was expecting some discussions somewhere as "log" is mentioned in this section, otherwise this mention of log is out of context in the document. Is there any particular reason for not mentioning (and log) for the permit case? _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list OPSEC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
