OK

So snmp check when run from cli slave is OK.

Then either the check on the slave should return the state to the master
using NSCA (send_nsca) or the master should initiate the check on the
slave using nrpe. I think the last one is simpler to implement. Adapt
nrpe.cfg, reload opsview-agent and run the check from the master

hth
paul

> Sorry Paul, I didn't explain.
> I receive OK from slave, I can't reach that ESXs from master: master is
> in DMZ, slave is in a strictly protected subnet. But it should be in
> this way, since master receive check info from slave by NSCA, am I wrong?
>
> Il 20/07/2010 9.12, [email protected] ha scritto:
>> So you have a master and a slave?
>> when it is ok, do you mean from slave and master? or just from master?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi Paul,
>>> if I execute the script in CLI it responds with an OK (if ESX is OK, of
>>> course) , usually after 15/20 secs...
>>> Thanks
>>> R
>>>
>>> Il 20/07/2010 8.58, [email protected] ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> Well, that implies the python check does not wait long enough,
>>>> therefore
>>>> not returning a proper exit code?
>>>>
>>>> hth
>>>> paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Henry,
>>>>> well.... it still doesn't work.
>>>>> I've a master and a distributed, I modified both nagios.cfg
>>>>> service_check_timeout=60
>>>>>
>>>>> and on master, added to opsview.conf the line
>>>>> $service_check_timeout=60;
>>>>>
>>>>> (60 is enough, usually the check needs no more than 20, 25 sec)
>>>>> reloaded the config... nothing, still (Service Check Timed Out) as
>>>>> output.
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you any other idea for my problem?
>>>>> Thank you very much for support!
>>>>>
>>>>> Il 19/07/2010 17.49, Henry ha scritto:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you're hitting the service_check_timeout of Nagios. I think i
>>>>>> remember you're able to override it in opsvie.conf, try adding a
>>>>>> line
>>>>>> like:
>>>>>> service_check_timeout=120
>>>>>> To get a 120 second timeout. And reload your Opsview config.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You should also see the timeout pararmter it in the generated
>>>>>> nagios.cfg
>>>>>> (somwhere at nagios/configs/Master Monitoring Server/nagios.cfg).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mo, 2010-07-19 at 17:28 +0200, Raffaello Poltronieri - Eutelia
>>>>>> SpA
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My check queries in SNMP protocol: no nrpe. To be honest, I wrote
>>>>>>> "my", but just to specify that's a custom check: it is pulled from
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> site:
>>>>>>> http://www.matthewjwhite.co.uk/blog/2010/02/09/monitoring-esxi-server-health-using-nagiosopsview/
>>>>>>> and it's written in pyton.
>>>>>>> It works great, but it needs more than 10 seconds. And, I don't see
>>>>>>> any option to extend time of timeout...
>>>>>>> Thank you for support Henry
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Il 19/07/2010 16.53, Henry ha scritto:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then I guess you use NRPE (check_nrpe) for your check. check_nrpe
>>>>>>>> features a '-t <timeout>' switch, default is 10 seconds. So you
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> edit the service check configuration to include the -t <timeout>
>>>>>>>> argument.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mo, 2010-07-19 at 16:30 +0200, Raffaello Poltronieri - Eutelia
>>>>>>>> SpA
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No Henry,
>>>>>>>>> I'd like Opsview to be "more patient": my check needs more time
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> perorm a result: as is now, I only receive a "check time out"
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> critical sttus in Opsview
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Il 19/07/2010 16.05, Henry ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You want to speed up your check?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Opsview-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Opsview-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Opsview-users mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Opsview-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Opsview-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Opsview-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Opsview-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opsview-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Opsview-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users
>


_______________________________________________
Opsview-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users

Reply via email to