Author: arma
Date: 2010-10-10 00:25:46 +0000 (Sun, 10 Oct 2010)
New Revision: 23532

Modified:
   website/trunk/about/en/torusers.wml
Log:
change - to mdash


Modified: website/trunk/about/en/torusers.wml
===================================================================
--- website/trunk/about/en/torusers.wml 2010-10-10 00:23:31 UTC (rev 23531)
+++ website/trunk/about/en/torusers.wml 2010-10-10 00:25:46 UTC (rev 23532)
@@ -311,11 +311,11 @@
     debate (<a 
href="http://www.wired.com/politics/security/commentary/securitymatters/2006/01/70000";>pro</a>,
     <a href="http://www.edge.org/q2006/q06_4.html#kelly";>con</a>, and <a
     href="http://web.mit.edu/gtmarx/www/anon.html";>academic</a>) over 
anonymity. The Tor project is based on the belief that anonymity is not
-    just a good idea some of the time - it is a requirement for a free and 
functioning society.  The <a href="http://www.eff.org/issues/anonymity";>EFF 
maintains a good overview</a> of how anonymity was crucial to the founding of 
the United States.  Anonymity is recognized by US courts as a fundamental and 
important right. In fact, governments mandate anonymity in many cases 
themselves:
+    just a good idea some of the time &mdash; it is a requirement for a free 
and functioning society.  The <a href="http://www.eff.org/issues/anonymity";>EFF 
maintains a good overview</a> of how anonymity was crucial to the founding of 
the United States.  Anonymity is recognized by US courts as a fundamental and 
important right. In fact, governments mandate anonymity in many cases 
themselves:
     <a href="https://www.crimeline.co.za/default.asp";>police tip lines</a>,
     <a 
href="http://www.texasbar.com/Content/ContentGroups/Public_Information1/Legal_Resources_Consumer_Information/Family_Law1/Adoption_Options.htm#sect2";>adoption
 services</a>,
     <a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/aronson/20020827.html";>police 
officer identities</a>,
-    and so forth. It would be impossible to rehash the entire anonymity debate 
here - it is too large an issue with too many nuances, and there
+    and so forth. It would be impossible to rehash the entire anonymity debate 
here &mdash; it is too large an issue with too many nuances, and there
     are plenty of other places where this information can be found. We do have 
a <a href="<page docs/faq-abuse>">Tor abuse</a> page describing some of
     the possible abuse cases for Tor, but suffice it to say that if you want 
to abuse the system, you'll either find it mostly closed for your
     purposes (e.g. the majority of Tor relays do not support SMTP in order to 
prevent anonymous email spamming), or if you're one of the

Reply via email to