On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:11:29AM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:35:04AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > i2p is not realy new.-) The Version History started in 2003. > > Personally, my position on I2P is that I have no idea how secure its > design is, since I haven't seen a protocol specification. So far as I > can tell, there isn't one. This doesn't mean that the protocol is > broken; just that I have no way of telling what the protocol actually > *is* without reading the source and assuming everything the source > does is intentional. >
In (approximately?) the words of Bob Morris, a system without a specification cannot fail; it can only surprise you. -Paul