Hi *Exile In Paradise* : >> [2 lignes citées masquées] > > It makes no sense to me at all to use TOR to access > a service nominated (and shortlisted) over and over > for Privacy International's "Big Brother" Awards: > > http://www.privacyinternational.org/article.shtml?cmd[347]=x-347-182940&als[theme]=Big%20Brother%20Awards > > I think 2005 was the third time Gmail was shorlisted? > > I don't know how much of http://www.google-watch.org/ > is quackery, kookism, or paranoia, but if even a > fraction of it is true, there are some scary abuses > already possible and more waiting to happen.
Big Bother or not, how Google may keeps an eye on our mails if it's encrypted with GnuPG ??? On SSL/TLS connexions ? With Tor? Talking about Big Brother (and paranoia): Tor was'nt developped at the beginning by a branch of the U.S. Navy ? ;-) >From a country (Bushland) governed by Dubya the 1st ? ;-) So how can you trust this ? ;-) Did we have to replace Tor with pigeons to carry our mail ? ;-) :D But can I really trust these pigeons ? AArrggg!!! I'll kill these pigeon right now: they never talk !!!!! ::) -- Claude LaFrenière