repeat after me: it's "Tor", _NOT_ "TOR" :)
On 3/9/07, Alexander W. Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... No; the point is if you'd qualify as an "access provider" you need to enable "relevant logging". ETSI already defined interfaces and data-sets which would come quite handy.
<data_retention> i have a policy that law breakers will leave evidence in logs and set the "evil bit" on all packets! [0][1] if it does get close to that bad over in EU, don't run Tor nodes in data centers. once those canaries have died begin to worry about that DSL exit... 0. "i have a policy..." http://www.kottke.org/04/07/my-new-policy 1. RFC 3514 - The Security Flag in the IPv4 Header http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3514.html
