-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > ... it would not surprise > me if they ran a server under a name like that just to scare people > into not using Tor.
That's an interesting issue. Who is scared by a suspicious server name and would thereupon stop using Tor? Not the absolute beginner who does not care about log files and not the expert who knows that an attacker needs all 3 out of 900+ routers a user chooses to subvert her privacy. However, I assume that the NSA would rather run 10, 20, or 50 nodes with inconspicuous names, sit back, and see what they can observe. But who knows? Perhaps they have multiple strategies? :) Karsten -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGDm/l0M+WPffBEmURAm6jAJ4vli39JrSvFJmcnxDjM4QcDwiEkQCeOEZa 9/4B8RDDMANaEfA/wXTr0h4= =hAq9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----