>> Polipo/tor was still 13% faster? > To which numbers are you referring here?
Sorry, I got confused. > However if I understand you correctly, you're saying that > I intentionally... My apologies, I got carried away. Juliusz
>> Polipo/tor was still 13% faster? > To which numbers are you referring here?
Sorry, I got confused. > However if I understand you correctly, you're saying that > I intentionally... My apologies, I got carried away. Juliusz