Hello TOR people, Yay! I did finally get server up, but all is not completely good: Anyone interested please note log entries.Thanks for advice and support. I hope to have it working perfectly soon. Am not sure exactly what to think of entries below: ***************************************** Oct 29 03:31:32.969 [Notice] Tor v0.2.0.7-alpha (r11572). This is experimental software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity. (Running on Linux i686) Oct 29 03:31:32.975 [Notice] Initialized libevent version 1.1a using method epoll. Good. Oct 29 03:31:32.979 [Notice] Opening OR listener on 0.0.0.0:9001 Oct 29 03:31:33.131 [Notice] Opening Directory listener on 0.0.0.0:9030 Oct 29 03:31:33.138 [Notice] Opening Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9050 Oct 29 03:31:33.142 [Notice] Opening Control listener on 127.0.0.1:9051 Oct 29 03:31:46.978 [Notice] Tor has successfully opened a circuit. Looks like client functionality is working. Oct 29 03:32:19.088 [Notice] Self-testing indicates your DirPort is reachable from the outside. Excellent. Oct 29 03:32:45.443 [Notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done. Oct 29 03:33:41.789 [Warning] eventdns: All nameservers have failed Oct 29 03:33:41.872 [Notice] eventdns: Nameserver 68.87.69.146 is back up Oct 29 03:33:46.790 [Warning] eventdns: All nameservers have failed Oct 29 03:33:46.856 [Notice] eventdns: Nameserver 68.87.69.146 is back up ************************************************
I can see from the Bandwith Graph that some traffic does flow through, though not a lot. Is this normal? Is it OK that I get a "nameserver" error and how can that problem be solved?? The listed back up is my normal DNS at comcast. Algenon algenon flower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Pei Hanru, experienced TOR users I have checked Linksys doc's and I think they were helpful. At present, I think I need to assign a static IP to my RHEL system behind NAT firewall. That seems to include two extra assigned IP numbers, like 196.168.1.20, Then I can use port forwarding set-up on NAT router. I bet this is elementary school for many of you, it took a little while for me :),, All I need now is the procedure to assign a static IP on RHEL. I am checking that now,, And, Hope it all Works! In any case, thanks to people interested, and additional comments welcome. peace, Algenon Pei Hanru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2007-10-27 06:23 CST, algenon flower wrote: > Hello Michael Holstein and other interested people > I thought I had accomplished port forwarding (see attached file) but > did not succeed. After checking with Linksys support site I am going to > try a new apporach. Will study the doc's from Linksys, if anyone has > experience with this please let me know. > Algenon Unfortunately, you are doing worse... What you should do is first figuring out the *actual* private IP address of your Linux box, then forwarding port 9001 and port 9030 (or port range 9001-9030 if you like) to *that* address, rather than forwarding the same port range to three distinct addresses. It's a good idea to reread port forwarding part of Linksys manual carefully. Hanru -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHJDrrtHG285r2MGoRAvAJAKDLRHZYc/5ZRXeNgaIXnZHUr/2zXgCeOqji h67261xOLOYdjvEyADPndks= =EmPN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com