-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Del Vecchio wrote: > Roger, I'm good to go except for one thing: The permissions issue with > the port being 443 (less than 1024). I think that port 443 is requested to not make the bridges totally useless: this features has been introduced for less fortunate tor users to get by heavily restricted networks, port 80 and 443 are the most commons available ports for outgoing connections. Said so, I think you should be ok with announcing port 443 and binding to the 9001, using iptables to redirect incoming connections.
Obviously I'm not a tor developer and I haven't (yet) switched over alpha so, feel free to prove me wrong :) - -- Marco Bonetti Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://workaround.ch Linux-live for powerpc: http://workaround.ch/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live My webstuff: http://sidbox.homelinux.org My GnuPG key id: 0x86A91047 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHbtshE3eWALCzdGwRAgZCAJ91xsum/Ud+6gdGBLO6ktBu2EsB1gCdEq/N GjsmURAK6K7sxn+LnY0SYMc= =FNtT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----