On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:27:01 +0100 Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Scott Bennett wrote: >| Last night I reported here that the directory authorities are in >| disagreement over client-versions and server-versions. Tonight they are >| still in disagreement. The consensus documents still fail to list any >| development branch versions later than 0.2.0.15-alpha as server-versions. >| When will the directory authority operators correct these two >problems? >| >The same notice shows up in my log after installing a fresh Tor >0.2.0.18-alpha (r13293) around noon today.
The latest consensus file appears to have 0.2.0.18-alpha listed as a recommended server version, but not 0.2.0.16-alpha or 0.2.0.17-alpha, even though it still lists 0.2.0.11-alpha, 0.2.0.12-alpha, and 0.2.0.15-alpha. Also, the individual status documents are still in considerable disagreement with each other. Are the directory authority operators getting careless? >By the way, if anyone cares: as of today, my node "cerebellum" is back >up! Only as a relay for now, but better a fast relay than nothing, right? > Welcome back! Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * **********************************************************************