I tried wget test now and Im confused a little bit. ------ m...@computer:~$ export http_proxy=http://localhost:8118 m...@computer:~$ wget http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.10/ubuntu-8.10-desktop-i386.iso --2009-02-13 15:06:10-- http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.10/ubuntu-8.10-desktop-i386.iso Překládám localhost... 127.0.0.1 Navazuje se spojení s localhost|127.0.0.1|:8118... spojeno. Proxy požadavek odeslán, program čeká na odpověď... 200 OK Délka: 732766208 (699M) [application/x-iso9660-image] Ukládám do: "ubuntu-8.10-desktop-i386.iso.3".
0% [ ] 1 925 103 424K/s -------- It received first bytes after ~ 4 seconds and run for 420kB/s. It is probably plot against my person, because I never had so good results :-). Nodes I used: kallio, Bellum, bach It is probably just luck, that these nodes are free now. Do you agree that this is not typical case, right? Marek On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:59 PM, slush <sl...@slush.cz> wrote: > Well, Firefox rendes HTML as fast as it is possible (instead of IE6), so I > dont think it is the reason. You can also try wget or something - it takes > hell long time to receive first byte of response and then it is fast enough. > > Original question was very simple: Where is the main difference between Tor > and JAP design, that JAP is spreading bandwidth much better than Tor? > > Thanks, > Marek > >
