On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:28:02 -0700 Kyle Williams <kyle.kwilli...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Sambuddho Chakravarty <sc2...@columbia.edu >> wrote: > >> Sambuddho Chakravarty wrote: >> >>> Andrew Lewman wrote: >>> >>>> On 07/13/2009 01:31 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 07/13/2009 01:24 PM, Sambuddho Chakravarty wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Is it possibly due to some firewall rules. But I have made sure that >>>>>> the >>>>>> host that runs the server is not filtering any packets... Still not >>>>>> sure >>>>>> why I get this . Infact you can try it out yourself >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> So long as your tor client can connect to the tor network, there is no >>>>> need to mess with firewalls, ports, or anything. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> I should also add that your hidden service lighttpd default page works >>>> fine. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Hello Andrew >>> Thanks a lot. Seems to be working right now for me... but I the behaviour >>> is at times erratic... >>> -Sambuddho >>> >>> >>> Hello Andrew >> Now it has suddenly again stopped. >> > >This is the nature of a over saturated network.
This claim keeps appearing on this list, yet I see my node usually using in the range of 10% - 40% of the limits I set on it to stay within Comcast's monthly cap. Back before I ran into Comcast's secret police division and had to set limits, it spent most of its time in the 35% - 70% range. >Hidden services seem spotty to me too, but their's not much I can do about >it except try again and be patient. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * **********************************************************************