On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:39:26PM -0500, Andrew Lewman wrote: > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:38:25 +0100, Eugen Leitl <eu...@leitl.org> wrote: > :Any suggestions for making Tor filling up 2-3 /24 networks, > :so that it doesn't break anything for the users? > > > Do you mean traffic from every IP in a 2-3 /24's? Run a few VMs, set
Yes.
> the Family option, and let lots of traffic flow.
I do not currently have the resources for 700+ VMs with a Tor
instance each. I can can fire up some 10, and rotate them
through the address space. What is the minimum useful time
for a Tor node? Hours, days? I don't want to hurt the Tor
network through pointless churn through address space but to help it.
I've received below suggestion. Does it make sense/
will it break anything with Tor?
From: Greg Hennessy <greg.henne...@nviz.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010
18:35:49 +0000
To: "discuss...@pfsense.com" <discuss...@pfsense.com>
Subject: RE: [pfSense-discussion] filling network with meaningful traffic
>From discussion-return-3659-eugen=leitl....@pfsense.com Thu Mar 11 19:36:00
>2010
Reply-To: discuss...@pfsense.com
Tor will bind to one inside address hung on a firewall leg. Portforward ingress
traffic hitting the entire public range to the inside
+ToR host and pool nat egress traffic.
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,8929.0.html
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html
No guarantee that it'll work. But it should generate traffic over the entire
assigned block.
Greg
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
