On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:39:26PM -0500, Andrew Lewman wrote: > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:38:25 +0100, Eugen Leitl <eu...@leitl.org> wrote: > :Any suggestions for making Tor filling up 2-3 /24 networks, > :so that it doesn't break anything for the users? > > > Do you mean traffic from every IP in a 2-3 /24's? Run a few VMs, set
Yes. > the Family option, and let lots of traffic flow. I do not currently have the resources for 700+ VMs with a Tor instance each. I can can fire up some 10, and rotate them through the address space. What is the minimum useful time for a Tor node? Hours, days? I don't want to hurt the Tor network through pointless churn through address space but to help it. I've received below suggestion. Does it make sense/ will it break anything with Tor? From: Greg Hennessy <greg.henne...@nviz.net> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:35:49 +0000 To: "discuss...@pfsense.com" <discuss...@pfsense.com> Subject: RE: [pfSense-discussion] filling network with meaningful traffic >From discussion-return-3659-eugen=leitl....@pfsense.com Thu Mar 11 19:36:00 >2010 Reply-To: discuss...@pfsense.com Tor will bind to one inside address hung on a firewall leg. Portforward ingress traffic hitting the entire public range to the inside +ToR host and pool nat egress traffic. http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,8929.0.html http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html No guarantee that it'll work. But it should generate traffic over the entire assigned block. Greg -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/