I would be most interested in knowing the explanation for the decision
that tor announced in the following pair of messages.
Apr 14 08:55:50.861 [info] connection_or_group_set_badness(): Marking OR conn
to 194.109.206.212:443 as too old for new circuits: (fd 7, 900 secs old). We
have a better canonical one (fd 118; 2239 secs old).
Apr 14 08:55:50.861 [info] run_connection_housekeeping(): Expiring non-used OR
connection to fd 7 (194.109.206.212:443) [Too old].
Why is the younger connection too old, yet the much older connection
is somehow "better"?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**********************************************************************
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu *
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
* "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army." *
* -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
**********************************************************************
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
