On 20.05.2010 06:25, Roger Dingledine wrote: > The trouble here is that if we make family declarations one-sided, then > I can tell everybody that I'm in blutmagie's family (and X's family and > Y's family and Z's family and ...), and suddenly I'm influencing the > path selection of other clients in a way I shouldn't be able to.
Maybe it is a misunderstanding on my side, but I agree with Scott. How could this influence the network in a way that one can speak of an "attack"? My idea was that by stating a family, I say that *my node* musn't be used in a circuit together with other members of that family, no more, no less. So, by misconfiguring the family on my side, I cannot hurt the network more than (in the extreme) by running no node at all. -- Moritz Bartl GPG 0xED2E9B44 http://moblog.wiredwings.com/ *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/