Jonathan D. Proulx wrote: > While I do think it's good to see the funding there are two points that > are important to remember. > > 1) this is a freesoftware project the code is there for all to see, > hopefully clueful people other than the US Government are reading it. > > 2) no matter who's funding it the US gov't could read the code (see > above) and would continue to (potentially) have a near global view of > internet traffic. > > To a large extent freesoftware defends agains the worst abuses funders > can demand (1), but I wouldn't fully trust TOR against China either (2) > > -Jon > *********************************************************************** > To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with > unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/ >
I think so too. But I have an asking - were there any court proceedings (successful or not) against tor-users based on their deanonimisation in the USA? Because I never hear or read about it I very want to know it. If there were no such proceedings it seems to me that we must acknowledge that efficiency of the Tor has very high level. *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/