Im quite ignorant abt onioncat . How was user authentication done in the onioncat+mumble combination ?? Reading on mumble says its been optimised for low latency , does that explain the lag ? Mumble has a client / server architecture so was the server run as a hidden service & the clients just spoke to the hidden service through tor ?? The torchat architecture seems decentralised to me as every participant is a hidden service himself & there is no single point of failure.Most voip clients hav a client/server model which im very keen to avoid. On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 7:57 PM, intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > Gregory Maxwell wrote (18 Dec 2010 11:08:39 GMT) : > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:55 AM, hhhh xhdhx <johncalis...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I figured the lgical thing to add to torchat would be voip .Is > >> there any move to that end , can anyone give me pointers as to > >> probable protocols , packages that can be ported to torchat .Or how > >> abt getting ekiga to do the same along with zrtp .??? > > Preliminary testing showed OnionCat + Mumble to be a working and > relatively easy to setup Tor-enabled VoIP solution; the 1/2s - 1s > delay is only slightly annoying. > > [1] http://www.cypherpunk.at/onioncat/ > [2] http://mumble.sourceforge.net/ > > Bye, > -- > intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org> > | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc > | OTR fingerprint @ > https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc > | If you must label the absolute, use it's proper name: Temporary. > *********************************************************************** > To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with > unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/ >