Hello Julie,
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Julie C wrote:
I suppose the anarchist genes in me are not strong enough. I have to agree
with Mike Perry's arguments, given his credibility, and his clearer
perspective than most of the rest of us. If this BadExit policy is being
made up ad-hoc, that's fine by me. If the offending Tor node operators want
to stand up and defend themselves, or their choices, that's fine too.
Great. What's the "acceptable" companion port to 119 ? How about 6667 ?
Since these ports, like 25, have no "standard" companion (like 80/443
typically does) what collection of encrypted ports need to be maintained
to balance out running 199/6667 ?
Come on people - I thought there would be quick answers to all of this...
RE: clearer perspective - it's easy to have a clear perspective when you
discount all possible use cases that "aren't what I do".
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
