Isn't that utterly ridiculous. If you didn't call the 2nd server a "failover" server and just manually moved over the filesystems and net address, you wouldn't need a 2nd license! But if you automate the process with failover software, you do! The database and software are only ever going to be on one server at a time so what's the big deal?
Oracle licensing has gotten so ridiculous that at our shop they've pretty much priced themselves out of the picture for all new databases. I suspect my managers aren't the only ones looking more seriously at SQL 2000 these days either. I'd look for Oracle to lose market share over the next 18 months. Not because SQL is better (it isn't), but the price performance ratio is much more acceptable.
Dennis Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just got my oracle quote back. I had asked about backup servers and
failover. To quote the salescritter, "In most cases where an environment
requires a standby failover server, a license will be required..."
Dennis Taylor
--------------------------------
The light at the end of the tunnel is the headlamp of an oncoming train.
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Dennis Taylor
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or th! ! e name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices!
