Waiting is probably good.

Besides knowing a couple of investment advisors (fellow soccer/little 
league dads, members of theology study study groups, and so forth), I 
try to listen to Louis Rukeyser's show on PBS every week 
(http://www.pbs.org/mpt/rukeyser), and as much of Bob Brinker's 
weekend radio show (http://www.bobbrinker.com) as possible. Don't 
have time to read WSJ or any of that.  

The "pro exuberance" investment cable shows that spring up during the 
tech bubble have been severely criticized for not following 
appropriate ethical practices about revealing the connections between 
the stock recommendations of the "analysts" that are on the shows, 
and the companies themselves (much less the connections between the 
giant media corps that own cable and the corps being recommended). 
What a mess.  

Anyway, conventional wisdom appears to be that no on knows what the 
heck is going to happen to the economy in the second half of the 
year. They say that *eventually* there are going to be some 
outstanding values in tech stocks (minus the "irrational exuberance", 
and that long term outlook for growth of the tech sector is 
excellent), but predicting the bottom for the whole sector or market 
is obviously very tough, much less any specific stock.  

Obviously the idea that there is a "new economy" (tech economy) that 
is somehow largely independent of the "old economy" has been shown, 
in the wake of the idiocy and madness that led to collapse the "dot 
com" phenomena, to have been both a form of collective hypnosis and 
yet another act by cynical market exploiters (whose business 
practices are at best ethically questionable, and IMO, legally little 
more than legally sanctioned thievery) such as short sale and "pump 
and dump" artists.  

The classic source of info: http://www.morningstar.com 

Note: they have several links to info on the tech sector on
their main page.

happy investing (or not, as the case may be),
ep

On 4 Apr 2001, at 8:01, Boivin, Patrice J wrote:

Date sent:              Wed, 04 Apr 2001 08:01:09 -0800
To:                     Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

...
> 
> I thought that a bit a diversifying (investing in the U.S. as well as
> Canada) might not be a bad thing, esp. if solid companies are currently
> undervalued.
> 
> I can wait though -- no rush.

...


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to