There are several Oracle tech notes that discuss NT and Windows 2000
Server Memory/Process architecture issues and limitations. I'll look
around and post anything I can find quick without having to go back
to Metalink.
If I recall correctly, Windows 2000 Advanced Server for RAM>=4G
requires XEON processors. With that, you can also have cpus>4.
regards,
ep
On 29 May 2001, at 8:50, Jonas A Wetterberg wrote:
...
> Now I have heard the Windows NT have a limit of how much memory one process
> might use, and that limit is somewhere around 1,7 G, and that that might be
> our problem.
>
> We are planing to upgrade to Oracle 8.1.7 and to Windows NT 4 Enterprise
> Edition or to Windows 2000 Advanced Server. Does anyone know if this can
> help? Should we put more memory or more processes in the machine?
...
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Eric D. Pierce
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).