>Does anyone use OFA as their company standard? If so, are there any
>complaints about it's structure? For example, the commingling of
>different database subdirectories under a given mount point?
>
>e.g..
>
>/u02/oradata/db_name1/userdata01.dbf
>/u02/oradata/db_name2/userdata01.dbf
>/u03/oradata/db_name1/userdata02.dbf
>/u03/oradata/db_name2/userdata02.dbf
>
>You cannot cd to a given subdirectory, ls -ltR | more to see all the
>datafiles associated with a given database. Instead, from / you
>have to ls -ltR | grep db_name1 to scan the full file system. Seems
>like there should be a better way.
>
>Any input, pro or con, is appreciated.
Linda,
The point of OFA is to spread out the database over different drives
for performance reasons. For example, you might want to separate
indexes from data. Would what you are proposing allow for multiple
drives?
Tim
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Tim Gardner
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
