I have a friend who states SQLJ is faster PLSQL, so I started reading up on
SQLJ, which I have always avoided as it didn't seem to impressive and I try
to avoid any sql in java files. In reading, I noticed it calls a "SQLJ"
runtime which is java. I can't believe this would outperform native PLSQL
which only has to do a single context switch to make a SQL call.
Anyone have any experience either way? Even Oracle claims PLSQL is faster:
"PL/SQL is a better solution for SQL-intensive applications. PL/SQL is
optimized for SQL, and so SQL operations are faster in PL/SQL than in Java.
Also, PL/SQL uses SQL datatypes directly, while Java applications must
convert between SQL datatypes and Java types."
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Christopher Spence
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
