Hmm, would it work to do an OS level copy so long as you get to the redo log
before it starts being written to again?
Just a random thought...
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:42 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I don't think, it's possible.
Most probably it checks 'archived' column in v$log.
Also, it keeps track of archived files in v$archived_log.
Igor
----- Original Message -----
To: Multiple <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 11:55 AM
Is it possible to re-archive an already archived
but still online redo log file?
the 8.1.6 sql*plus manual says it is, but
I can't get the syntax down right apparently.
SQL> archive log 227
returns a ORA-16013 (does not need archiving) error
and
SQL> archive log 227 to '/tmp'
returns
SP2-0718 illegal arhicve log option
Anybody done this?
----
Matt Adams - GE Appliances - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing linear scans over an associative array is like
trying to club someone to death with a loaded Uzi.
- Larry Wall (creator of Perl)
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Miller, Jay
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
