> I would love to hold a
> valid threat over their
heads
The key word is valid. Threatening to throw a
switch and blow up any SQL that contains literals is a threat, but is it a
valid threat?
I mean, what was your previous job, suicide
bomber?
Seriously, providing accurate measurement of how
much the extra parsing now costs, along with an evaluation of current CPU use
and an estimate of how much longer they have before the system bottlenecks might
be a touch more civilized.
|
Title: Egregious coding
- Egregious coding Hagedorn, Linda
- RE: Egregious coding John Lewis
- RE: Egregious coding Wong, Bing
- RE: Egregious coding Wong, Bing
- RE: Egregious coding Norwood Bradly A
- Re[2]: Egregious coding Greg Moore
- Re[2]: Egregious coding dgoulet
- RE: Egregious coding Hagedorn, Linda