-----Original Message-----
From: Hallas John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:01 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC SymmetrixAt one site I worked using Oracle Financials we were having serious performance problems at what seemed to us random intervals. Spent months looking at the database after the Unix boys had said that there was no way we could have I/O problems with the throughput capabililities of EMC and the Symetrix set up we had.
Eventually turned out that 3 systems were sharing the same disks and the disks had not been striped. Therefore other system were causing us performance problems.
If you have an EMC support contract which I think you must have you, the SA's get all the free GUI tools that allow them to look at channels and logical/physical layout. Ask them about.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 September 01 12:55
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symmetrix
!! Please do not post Off Topic to this List !!
Hi All,
Does anybody here on the list have experience with EMC/symmetrix storage
units.?We have our databases on this machine and I have a feeling the the I/O
performance is not very good. I can not proof it since I do not have any
experience/data/access to that machine. We do however have a very
cooperative UNIX group but they also lack experience with performance on
this machine.Who can give me pointers about I/O throughput that can be reached,
configuration pittfalls etc..Example:
RS6000 8CPU's and 4Gb memory with storage on EMC/symmetrix. Job takes about
2 hours to complete.F50 1 CPU 1Gb memory (TEST machine) local disks. same job takes 0.5 hours
to complete.
Jack
=====================================================================
De informatie verzonden in dit e-mailbericht is vertrouwelijk en is
uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Openbaarmaking,
vermenigvuldiging, verspreiding en/of verstrekking van deze informatie aan
derden is, behoudens voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van Ernst &
Young, niet toegestaan. Ernst & Young staat niet in voor de juiste en
volledige overbrenging van de inhoud van een verzonden e-mailbericht, noch
voor tijdige ontvangst daarvan. Ernst & Young kan niet garanderen dat een
verzonden e-mailbericht vrij is van virussen, noch dat e-mailberichten
worden overgebracht zonder inbreuk of tussenkomst van onbevoegde derden.Indien bovenstaand e-mailbericht niet aan u is gericht, verzoeken wij u
vriendelijk doch dringend het e-mailbericht te retourneren aan de verzender
en het origineel en eventuele kopieën te verwijderen en te vernietigen.Ernst & Young hanteert bij de uitoefening van haar werkzaamheden algemene
voorwaarden, waarin een beperking van aansprakelijkheid is opgenomen. De
algemene voorwaarden worden u op verzoek kosteloos toegezonden.
=====================================================================
The information contained in this communication is confidential and is
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed. You should not copy, disclose or distribute this communication
without the authority of Ernst & Young. Ernst & Young is neither liable for
the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this
communication nor for any delay in its receipt. Ernst & Young does not
guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor
that the communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference.If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please return
the communication to the sender and delete and destroy all copies.In carrying out its engagements, Ernst & Young applies general terms and
conditions, which contain a clause that limits its liability. A copy of
these terms and conditions is available on request free of charge.
=====================================================================
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
**********************************************************************
This email and any attachments may be confidential and the subject of
legal professional privilege. Any disclosure, use, storage or copying
of this email without the consent of the sender is strictly prohibited.
Please notify the sender immediately if you are not the intended
recipient and then delete the email from your inbox and do not
disclose the contents to another person, use, copy or store the
information in any medium.
**********************************************************************
Title: RE: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symmetrix
We saw
this at a previous location and we found that we had logical volumes on the same
disk.. Used for different applications, and even different systems!! For
example-someone placed TEMP for DB1 and TEMP for DB2 on the same disk
unknowingly.... This created just a small contention
problem...
This
is a common problem when large sym cabinets are set up with "logical volumes
split to different systems".
Each
LV may be defined such that you wont know that they are on the same disk.
If you are using BCV's, and clustering-it get's even more detailed and
confusing...
Have
the EMC rep come in, take a look at the "bin" file of your sym cabinet(s).. And
see where the logical volumes are living.. Draw a map of the bin file with
a graphical representation of each LV, and where they
live...
Greg
- I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symmetrix nlzanen1
- Re: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symme... Gene Sais
- RE: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symme... Hallas John
- Re: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symme... Don Granaman
- Re:RE: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Sy... Loughmiller, Greg
- Re:RE: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Sy... dgoulet
- RE: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symme... Hallas John
- Re: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symme... nlzanen1
- RE: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symme... Greg Solomon
- RE: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symme... Koivu, Lisa
- Re: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symme... Jonathan Lewis
- Re: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symme... nlzanen1
- Re: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symme... Don Granaman
- Re: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symme... nlzanen1
- Re: I/O Performance/bottlenecks on EMC Symme... Gaja Krishna Vaidyanatha