MQ Series

[Bond Mike A Contr OC-ALC/TILC]

Title: RE: Problems with patchsets to 8.1.7.0.0 on Windows 2000

Hi,   Has anyone used MQ Series to get data to an Oracle database?  If so I have a few questions.  How?  Documentation? ...   Thanks,   Mike         -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Spence [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 9:25 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Problems with patchsets to 8.1.7.0.0 on Windows 2000 I did 8.1.7.1 then did 8.1.7.5   "Do not criticize someone until you walked a mile in their shoes, that way when you criticize them, you are a mile a way and have their shoes." Christopher R. Spence Oracle DBA Phone: (978) 322-5744 Fax:    (707) 885-2275 Fuelspot 73 Princeton Street North, Chelmsford 01863   -----Original Message----- From: Jacques Kilchoer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 6:26 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Problems with patchsets to 8.1.7.0.0 on Windows 2000   From reading the instructions with 8.1.7.2.1 I had the impression that you had to move to 8.1.7.1.1 first and then 8.1.7.2 ? In any case, I had previously installed the Oracle Universal Installer that came with 8.1.7.0.0, and so I used that to apply the patch, because, like you, I was unable to run the "setup.exe" that came with the patchset. (Windows 2000 server) > -----Original Message----- > From: Don Granaman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 11:29 AM > > I have Oracle 8.1.7.0.0 running on a Windows 2000 Pro (sp2).  > I tried to install > the 8.1.7.2.1 patchset according to the "readme" directions > (shutdown all > Oracle* services first, etc.), but when I try to run > "setup.exe", nothing > happens.  The icon flashes momentarily after being > double-clicked, but nothing > ever actually runs.  I tried it a number of times.  Then I > tried it with an > older 8.1.7.1.1 patchset - and the exactly same thing > happened.  These patchsets > are for "Windows NT", but I assumed they would work for 2000 > as well.  (Am I > wrong in this assumption?)  Does anyone have any experience > with this and/or > workarounds?