The Oracle pricing for named:concurrent user was a factor of 2:1, I remember distinctly since we converted a number of named users to concurrent when we signed a contract for our network license agreement a few years ago. I thought that ratio was low, since you get a lot more value from the concurrent license in terms of supporting users. Kim
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Author: Djordje Jankovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at ~ctl-internet-po Date: 11/19/01 12:01 PM Hi, Anybody happen to know what was the ratio between a concurrent license and named user license price, when oracle used to have those licensing models (before switching to famous UPU). I would like to see how fair is conversion factor of 2 that oracle now uses from concurrent -> named license conversion. Thanks. Djordje
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <TITLE>RE: applications patches</TITLE> <META content="MSHTML 5.00.3103.1000" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=992355919-19112001>Hi,</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=992355919-19112001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=992355919-19112001>Anybody happen to know what was the ratio between a concurrent license and named user license price, when oracle used to have those licensing models (before switching to famous UPU). I would like to see how fair is conversion factor of 2 that oracle now uses from concurrent -> named license conversion.</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=992355919-19112001>Thanks.</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=992355919-19112001></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=#0000ff face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=992355919-19112001>Djordje</SPAN></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>