Jared, 

Thanks. I have the main RK book. Like it. Understand what
little i have read of it. I am just interested in what
folks thought about "size vs. DW definition" was. 

I *do* think, tho, that "size does matter". 

I don't consider my shared E: drive a datawarehouse
because it can support a star query, one user, and 
300 MB of data. 

There is 'something' to do with the fact of...alot of
data....skewed dimensions...regular updates...data
cleaning...supporting mining ( and mining for a few
tiny facts in a big haystack requires, after all, the
big haystack ) 

Anyways. 

I figure anything under 250 GB doesn't even merit
being called a data Warehouse.

Maybe a data 7-11.   <shrug> 

Thanks for the pointers and your thoughts. 

Ross

-----Original Message-----
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/6/2001 7:32 PM



Ross,

A DW is defined by purpose and design, not by size.

A collection of Data Marts, ( tables for star joins ) is not
a DW either.  DW's are used to create data marts.

If you don't already have the database books from
Kimball, I suggest you acquire them.

Data Warehouse Toolkit
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471153370/ref=pd_sim_books/104-7
669992-7054323

Data Warehouse Lifecycle Toolkit
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471255475/ref=pd_sim_books/104-7
669992-7054323

These are must haves for understanding and designing DW.

Jared




 

                    "Mohan, Ross"

                    <MohanR@STARS-       To:     Multiple recipients of
list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>        
                    SMI.com>             cc:

                    Sent by:             Subject:     Datawarehouse
Sizes.....informal poll.                        
                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                    om

 

 

                    12/06/01 01:55

                    PM

                    Please respond

                    to ORACLE-L

 

 





Informal survey: Datawarehousing.

Limiting Assumption:   "A necessary and sufficient condition for
defining
something
                                          to be a datawarehouse is the
amount of data
to be stored."

Question/Poll:   Given the above ridiculous constraint, at/above what
size
can something
                                          be considered a data
warehouse?
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Mohan, Ross
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Mohan, Ross
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to