Is it so necessary to have table with 100 Mil. records? Now way how to break data into more tables?
Jan Pruner On Fri 8. February 2002 05:53, you wrote: > Hi All, > > We are developing a system in which some tables in the database might be > having about 100 Million records. We are planning to use table and index > partition's as a means to improve performance. Could you please share > your experiences/views about handling such huge tables. Is this > partitioning sufficient or do we have to look in to some other means. > > It would also be of great help if you could provide me some pointers to > documents which gives some insight for handling such tables and > databases. > > thanks in advance, > Sathish. -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Jan Pruner INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
