Nice to know the actual strategy.

I came across an oddity some time ago
when trying to work this one out by setting
silly values for INITRANS.  This would be
(correctly) ignored on a 'create index', and
then obeyed on a 'rebuild index' with the
result that the index got bigger.  I think
it was 8.1.5 - it doesn't reproduce in 8.1.7.3


Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Now running 3-day intensive seminars
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html

Host to The Co-Operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html

Author of:
Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases


-----Original Message-----
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 05 March 2002 03:05


|
|And yes.. There is an upper bound for number of ITLs based on the
block
|size.
|The transaction slots (and other headers) can not use the more than
50% of
|the
|space available  for data in the data block. Each ITL will take 24
bytes of
|space
|in variable header part of the data block.
|


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jonathan Lewis
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to