This inquiring mind want's to know, what is honorary about being thought of
as a man instead of the women you are?
Ruth.
----- Original Message -----
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 10:23 AM


>
>
> as one of the women in this profession, do I want to know who you consider
> "honorary men"?  :)
>
> What I do want to know is how you determine what the criteria are for
being an
> "honorary man".
>
> Inquiring minds want to know :)
>
> Rachel
>
>
>
> |--------+----------------------->
> |        |                       |
> |        |                       |
> |        |          sfaroult@orio|
> |        |          le.com       |
> |        |                       |
> |        |          05/18/2002   |
> |        |          11:13 AM     |
> |        |          Please       |
> |        |          respond to   |
> |        |          ORACLE-L     |
> |        |                       |
> |--------+----------------------->
>   >----------------------------------------------------|
>   |                                                    |
>   |       To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]                 |
>   |       cc:     (bcc: Rachel Carmichael)             |
>   |       Subject:     Re: Do you ever have days where |
>   |       you dont want to think ?                     |
>   >----------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
> Larry Elkins wrote:
> >
> > The beach part sounds great, though I don't care to see naked men
running
> > around ;-)
>
>  That's the problem in this job. Too many men. And among women, too many
> are like honorary men.
>
>
> Still preaching the gospel, as you can see :-). In fact, I would be
> curious to compare the join on the inline-view with a MINUS to the hash
> anti-join. Assuming all correct indexes, it is comparing two index fast
> full scans plus sort plus index search to two table full scans (more or
> less). I am almost certain that many costs could be put into equations.
> The problem is if you have too many values (number of rows, number of
> rows returned, storage, selectivity, etc...) to feed into your equations
> or have trouble deriving these it is not of much use.
> Wanted to do some tests on reverse indexes, following your posts, but I
> have not had time. Not much progress on the book PL/SQL chapter either.
> Currently working on real-time, home-made replication (which works on
> the standard edition, BTW). Still revolving around the same topics
> because one of my concerns is to minimize overhead when logging
> (trigger-happy replication, I am suspicious of the Shareplex approach
> and anyway as I want to be able to replicate between France, Japan and
> the US, I cannot afford to transfer full redo logs and transactions I
> shall have to rollback). I log into several tables (enough info to
> rebuild statements, and values separately - with additional problems
> when we reach the 4,000 characters mark), IOTs are the obvious choice
> but I am not sure it is available with all licenses. Degradation of my
> logs over timeis also something I have to watch. This is for the days.
> Evenings are spent improving an intelligent loader able to take into
> account complex FK relationships. I have prepared two 5,000,000 row
> tables, one in my 8.1.7 database and one in my 9.0.1 database, but I
> have not tested anything yet.
> I had a flash of idiocy and subscribed to the OT list (out of the
> blues). I doubt I will stay long here. Some people seems to be paid
> doing nothing but e-mailing. Is this where you got the details about
> Pierce? Pretty active there.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stephane Faroult
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> --
> Author: Stephane Faroult
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
>
>
>
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> --
> Author:
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Ruth Gramolini
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to