-- "Weaver, Walt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/31/02 13:59:22 -0800
> If there's only one user accessing it, yes.
>
> --Walt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:44 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
> a) It's blindingly fast as a single user database, faster then oracle.
>
> Really? Even with a 30 million record table?
Depends on what they are doing. MySQL doesn't claim to be
ACID, just fast. If multiple users are reading a table
that isn't configured for locks then it could be faster
than Oracle. The overhead and complexity introducted into
Oracle by rollback handling is a major slowdown for anythng
the database does.
This is mainly a matter of applying a tool in the way it was
designed to be used. MySQL is intended for primarily read-
access databases or smaller ones where the less granular
locking is not so much of a problem.
--
Steven Lembark 2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing Chicago, IL 60647
+1 800 762 1582
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
