Title: RE: DBMS_SYSTEM.KSDWRT question
Thanks Tony,
 
I have been told not to use standard auditing ...
 
Raj
______________________________________________________

Rajendra Jamadagni              MIS, ESPN Inc.

Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com

Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.

QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!

-----Original Message-----
From: Aponte, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DBMS_SYSTEM.KSDWRT question

We've been using KSDWRT in logon and table triggers (as well as in maintenance jobs for our 24x7 databases that didn't have a UTL_FILE_DIR entry) and have yet to encounter a problem.  I trussed a background process that used the procedure and it wrote to the files using the same I/O commands that it uses for other commands (like ALTER DATABASE BACKUP CONTROLFILE TO TRACE).

For the other procedures I'd do truss the session connected to a development server to see what they cause at the OS level.

Is there a reason why you aren't using standard auditing to capture DDL activity?

HTH
Tony Aponte

*********************************************************************This e-mail 
message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may 
contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from 
disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this message in error, or are 
not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify corporate MIS at (860) 766-2000 
and delete this e-mail message from your computer, Thank 
you.*********************************************************************2


Reply via email to