Can you help me?
I have a query , where i join a big
partitioned table with 2 smaller tables using hash join and sort group by.
I
want to use to read the big partitioned table with parallel-option to get better
performance.
But i havn't any performance benefits running with parallel
or without parallel!!
On Metalink i found Doc-id 212644.995 with
following information:
run the explain plan and confirm there is no
PARALLEL_FROM_SERIAL , they are big bottlenecks.
Do you know something about such problems with parallel? Have you also problems with parallel and big sorts?
Thank for any help!!
Best regards,
Brigitte T¨¹rk
