All I'm saying is that the parameter wouldn't have nearly as much effect as the _centripedal_acceleration parameter, which as we all know keeps the bits from flying off of HDs, especially the 15K spin. I believe it's undocumented now, since setting it to "false" caused corruption from bit loss.
(how's that?) Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Gorman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 12:38 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: Re: _spin_count Revealed > > > Such a drag to detract from a good story using facts... > > ...which is how the whole discussion got started... > > ----- Original Message ----- > To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:18 AM > > > > I doubt the _counter_corriolis_effect parameter would do much: > > > > http://www.ems.psu.edu/~fraser/Bad/BadCoriolis.html > > -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Jesse, Rich INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
