Ditto for PostgreSQL. For portability you can create a dual table but you have to ensure that it only has one row. ;-) I finding that portability between PostgreSQL and Oracle is easier than most... same to_date, to_char functions, and stuff. Seems like that's part of Postgres' strategy.
-----Original Message----- Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 9:24 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L DBA/Developer/NYC As well as in MySQL >There is no need for such table in SQL Server. >If you need, you do just: > >select 'whatever' > >without "from" clause. Gints Plivna IT Sistēmas, Merķeļa 13, LV1050 Rīga http://www.itsystems.lv/gints/ -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Orr, Steve INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).