Thats a CBO trace. Have fun trying to read it :)  Actually, there was an
excellent presentation from a Wolfgang Breitling on this very topic at IOUG.
And I believe Cary's site carries it (hotsos.com).
 
John Kanagaraj 
Oracle Applications DBA 
DB Soft Inc 
Work : (408) 970 7002 

Listen to great, commercial-free christian music 24x7x365 at
http://www.klove.com <http://www.klove.com/>  

** The opinions and facts contained in this message are entirely mine and do
not reflect those of my employer or customers **

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 10:56 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



I know what a 10046 trace does. What's 
a 10053 trace? 

---- 
Matt Adams - GE Appliances - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Their fundamental design flaws are completely 
hidden by their superficial design flaws. 
          - Douglas Adams 

-----Original Message----- 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:42 PM 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: Adams, Matthew (GEA, MABG, 088130) 
Importance: High 


Matt, 

Have you done a 10053 trace on this query? 

Jared 






"Adams, Matthew (GEA, MABG, 088130)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 09/30/2002 11:43 AM 
 Please respond to ORACLE-L 


        To:     Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: extremely long parse time 


OK, I think we're on to something here. 
The DBA_TAB_COL_STATISTICS shows no rows for tables 
owned by sys (although strangely, owner is not a column 
of this table).  However, the DBA_ANALYZE_OBJECTS view IS 
listing objects owned by SYS, which implies that they have 
been analyzed in the past. 
Since I don't see any of the statisics filled in on the 
DBA_TABLES entries for tables owned by SYS, what would 
you recommend doing at this point? 
"analyze table sys.XXXXX delete statistics"? 


---- 
Matt Adams - GE Appliances - [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Their fundamental design flaws are completely 
hidden by their superficial design flaws. 
          - Douglas Adams 
-----Original Message----- 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:27 PM 
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
Cc: Adams, Matthew (GEA, MABG, 088130) 

Hmmm...anything SYS in DBA_TAB_COL_STATISTICS or DBA_ANALYZE_OBJECTS? 
Is the COST column in your PLAN_TABLE null??? 
Rich Jesse                           System/Database Administrator 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]              Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI 
USA 
-----Original Message----- 
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:38 PM 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 

We are using First_rows for the optimizer mode, 
but the last_analyzed column in DBA_TABLES and 
DBA_INDEXES is NULL for all objects owned by SYS. 
The really wierd part is:  Changing the query 
to use rule based optimization (via the /*+ RULE */ hint 
caused it to execute sub-second. 
Why would optimization mode affect parsing?  Is query 
optimization considered part of the parsing routine? 
Matt 

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: John Kanagaraj
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to