Yes I believe that I have all the files necessary. The database does not complain about missing files but corrupt files ie the redolog etc.
I'll have to check on the transactional applications options though, if you mean Oracle they are exact, but I'll take it up with the Double-Take techie.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Bishop Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 6:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: RE: Double Take and Oracle
Eva - just checking - from their docs have you verified that the
transactional applications option is selected on the optimisations screen?
This seems the most likely omission - and are you also sure that you are
including all necessary files in the selected copy?
Lewis Bishop
---
Barclays Enable - ISS - E-NTRUST/Bexleyheath NT
Oracle Database Consultant
Watling Street, Bexleyheath, Kent, DA6 7RR (Mail Van R)
Phone : 020 8298 3418
Mobile: 07950 380857
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Enabling Competitive Advantage for Barclays in IT and Business Processing"
-----Original Message-----
Sent: 15 October 2002 16:09
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Thanks for the input so far. Double-Take works real time so the database is
never down.
I also followed their setup direction to the letter. Problem on our site is
that this product is being used for SQL Server and Exchange (Appears to work
fine there, but Oracle is a beast of another color compared to these "Access
on Steroids" databases), management are insisting for the sake of conformity
that this must work. At ever attempted startup another file gives an error,
most frustrating of all is that there is almost no consistency to the
errors.
Denham Eva
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 4:04 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Lewis,
I can understand where Eva is coming from. I had a demo of a similar
product some time ago. Their BIG selling point is that you have a
production
server and a backup that is close in time with your production server at
half
(or less) the cost of a hot standby. Their reasoning is that you don't have
Oracle running on the standby and consequently don't have to pay Oracle a
license fee for the second server since only one server is running at any
point
in time. Logically their point is well taken. Regrettably and
understandably
that is NOT Oracle's point of view.
Dick Goulet
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Bishop Lewis
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
DISCLAIMER
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. TFMC, its holding company, and any of its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor and manage all e-mail communications through its networks.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be views of any such entity.
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by MailMarshal - For more information please visit www.marshalsoftware.com
