Yes, we have noticed significant response problems after upgrading from
8.0.5 to 8.1.7.4 using FIRST_ROWS. It seems that something new in 8i is
affecting onwards affects the performance.

For example we have a standard DBA script to collect information on extents
against a specified user/table and response went up to 282 seconds.
Inserting the RULE hint in the script returned the response time back to
it's normal 3 seconds. Not had time to investigate but there are obviously
some implications here with FIRST_ROWS.
 
Lewis Bishop
---
Barclays Enable - ISS - E-NTRUST/Bexleyheath NT
Oracle Database Consultant
Watling Street, Bexleyheath, Kent, DA6 7RR (Mail Van R)
Phone : 020 8298 3418
Mobile: 07950 380857
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Enabling Competitive Advantage for Barclays in IT and Business Processing"
 

-----Original Message-----
Sent: 30 October 2002 17:19
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L

We have an OLTP system that I thought will benefit from first rows.
The sad fact is that when I set optimization to first rows the response
sucks.

Do some testing, as you can change this anytime.

Yechiel Adar
Mehish
----- Original Message -----
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:13 PM


> We're moving from RBO to CBO.
>
> For those of you who use CBO, what mode do you use FIRST_ROWS or ALL_ROWS?
> And why?
>
> My thinking is if it's a database where most of the querying is done on
> small sets of records, then we may want to use FIRST_ROWS. On the other
> hand, if our database is used to generate sizable reports, we might use
> ALL_ROWS.
>
> I also understand that we can always change it per session (with alter
> session) and per query (with hints).
>
> Michael Armstead
> Principal Database Administrator, OCP-Certified
> World Wide Corporate IT Database Administration
> GlaxoSmithKline
>
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> --
> Author: Armstead, Michael A
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Yechiel Adar
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Bishop Lewis
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to