I don't think they do that on purpose, it's just that for them, it makes more sense to have most of their staff work on the same version, instead of actively trying to improve 3-4 versions at the same time.
Regards, Patrice Boivin Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA) Systems Admin & Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes Technology Services | Services technologiques Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique Maritimes Region, DFO | Région des Maritimes, MPO E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 6:14 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > -----Original Message----- > > Isn't there an adage "if it ain't broke, don't fix it?" > Well .... But haven't you noticed that there are ALWAYS a few bugs that have been strategically sprinkled about in any given release, the fix to which is "upgrade to version x.y.z"? Or is this just a Tru64 thing? The old strategy of Planned Obsolescence? -- -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Boivin, Patrice J INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
