Correct -

I was sure that I had a set of test results to 
prove my point, but I didn't - so I've just run
a series of tests on  enqueue and buffer busy waits 
on an 8.1.7.4 system and you are absolutely right -
 the seconds_in_wait does not reset as the wait
completes.  

Thanks,

Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Coming soon a new one-day tutorial:
Cost Based Optimisation
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html )

Next Seminar dates: 
(see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html )

____England______January 21/23


The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html





-----Original Message-----
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 22 December 2002 02:28


>> It is a common error to assume that v$session_wait
>> is showing a wait time - however if the STATE is 
>> __not__ "WAITING" then the SECONDS_IN_WAIT
>> column is the time since the last wait ended.
>
>It's actually the time since the last wait *began*, right?
>
>
>Cary Millsap
>Hotsos Enterprises, Ltd.
>http://www.hotsos.com
>
>Upcoming events:
>- Hotsos Clinic 101, Jan 7-9 Knoxville
>- Steve Adams's Miracle Master Class, Jan 13-15 Copenhagen
>- 2003 Hotsos Symposium, Feb 9-12 Dallas
>
>


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jonathan Lewis
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to