I think I'll resist the temptation to review the entire trace file. However, since this is a v9 deadlock dump, I think you should find that you have a complete processstate dump after the initial deadlock graph.
Somewhere near the end of the dump you should find the CURSOR section, which should list all the current cursors for the session. Read through these, they may give you a clue about the SQL that has pushed the TM lock from a 3 to a 5 on the problem table. Regards Jonathan Lewis http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk Coming soon a new one-day tutorial: Cost Based Optimisation (see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html ) Next Seminar dates: (see http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html ) ____England______January 21/23 The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html -----Original Message----- To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 27 December 2002 00:15 >Yes it is 9013. This is not an array based update. As per the trace file >same statement is being executed by both sessions. I can directly send you >the trace file if there is a need. > >There are triggers on the tables, I'll look into parent table activity. But >there are indexes on all foreign keys except one which corresponds to a >static master table containing PO TYPES. That table is not being updated. > >How can I dig deeper into this issue. > >Thanks >Shaleen -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Jonathan Lewis INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
