Didn't the now-infamous State of California deal involve a 3rd-party
reseller?

Roy Pardee
Programmer/Analyst
SWFPAC Lockheed Martin IT
Extension 8487

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:09 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


  I just renewed our Cognos support.  It took 2 emails and a 10 minute phone
call (of which 8 minutes were spent talking football - go Eagles!).
  Contrast this with our Oracle support "negotiations" which have been going
on since SEPTEMBER!  I'll spare you the details, but let's just say that I
am extremely frustrated with this licensing subject.  I've watched the
Software Investment Guide change several times during the last few months.
It seems like the rules that you are trying to play by are constantly
changing - now I see this reference to "Price Hold" for named users - where
does that come from?  I think management would switch to another DB vendor
in a heartbeat just so they could understand what they're paying for.  Is
licensing for those *other* databases just as complicated (not that I
advocate an attempted migration, mind you)?
  The one thing I've learned in this process is to always run your numbers.
Our contract said a 10% discount, but the numbers didn't reflect it.
  Does anybody go through a 3rd party for buying their Oracle support?  I
know that vendors can resell licenses - can they resell support too?  I'm
thinking that it might be less of a headache to deal with a vendor than with
Oracle.

Jay

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/16/03 12:13AM >>>
Hi Jared

I have a reply from someone who does not want to be identified.
This is his case.  

His company tried reasoning and discussing it with Oracle
and even tried a compromised (which I would not be happy with)

He company put forward to Oracle to pay for the full licence
on the production server AND the minimum for the standby.
In the case the standby was a single CPU and so the minimum
licence is a 5 User Licence.  This was to account for any DBA
connection to check the integrity of the standby database.
Even this was not acceptable to Oracle. How greedy can you be?
Can you say "Gordon Gekko"?

BTW   The following information applies to all 
You need to know the difference between NAMED USER and
NAMED USER PLUS.  (extract from SELECT*Star)

Gone also is the "Named User" license. In its place is 
"Named User Plus. Companies wanting to purchase additional 
user licenses for the same machine will need to convert 
their Named User licenses to Named User Plus licenses 
if they do not have a "Price Hold" on the license. 
The minimum number of licenses must be the greater of 
either the actual number of users or the 
Minimum Named User Plus (25 per CPU) for the server. 



Minimum Named User (Enterprise Edition) per CPU 
used to be 10 but now the minimum Named User Plus 
per CPU is 25. In some instances, customers are 
forced to buy more licenses than is required 
when looking for additional licenses.

The key difference between Named User and 
Named User Plus is that Named User does not allow 
for batch processing whereas Named User Plus does.

ta
tony


At 08:57 PM 15/01/2003 -0800, Jared Still wrote:


>Thanks Tony.
>
>Looks like Larry E is trying to boost revenues in a down
>economy by any means necessary.
>
>You're right, this doesn't seem right.
>
>Jared




**DISCLAIMER
This e-mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended for the
use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, proprietary and confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the
message or any information contained in the message. If you have received
this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail
message. The contents do not represent the opinion of D&E except to the
extent that it relates to their official business.
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jay Hostetter
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Pardee, Roy E
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to