A valid point. But say, what if an primary key, such as, employee number
has to be changed, or reused? Aaaah!!!

Forget it. Typed that in just for arguments sake ;-)

Thanks
Raj




                                                                                       
                             
                    Jared.Still@r                                                      
                             
                    adisys.com           To:     Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>        
                    Sent by:             cc:                                           
                             
                    root@fatcity.        Subject:     Re: over-normalized?             
                             
                    com                                                                
                             
                                                                                       
                             
                                                                                       
                             
                    January 23,                                                        
                             
                    2003 01:40 PM                                                      
                             
                    Please                                                             
                             
                    respond to                                                         
                             
                    ORACLE-L                                                           
                             
                                                                                       
                             
                                                                                       
                             




> An update could end up
> having to write to multiple tables. So, I guess, you have to walk the
tight
> rope between these issues, and having a perfectly normalized database.

You might want to rethink that statement.  The goal of a
relational database is to have no redundant data.

If you have to update multiple tables in a transaction, so what?

That is certainly preferable to being required to ferret out all
the tables that store the same information, and must therefore be
updated together, as in a denormalized database.

Jared







[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 01/23/2003 09:15 AM
 Please respond to ORACLE-L


        To:     Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: over-normalized?



How many join table operations do you perform, in most of the queries? As
more tables are added to the join, you take a performance hit? Plus, all
the space for the indexes on the additional tables? An update could end up
having to write to multiple tables. So, I guess, you have to walk the
tight
rope between these issues, and having a perfectly normalized database.

To quote George Koch "No major application will run in third normal form".

Raj





                    "Saira Somani"
                    <saira_somani@        To:     Multiple recipients of
list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                    yahoo.com>            cc:
                    Sent by:              Subject:     over-normalized?

                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    om


                    January 23,
                    2003 11:00 AM
                    Please respond
                    to ORACLE-L






Is there such thing as an over-normalized database design?
What defines over-normalization? And what are its consequences? (Other
than the obvious degraded database performance and lots of tuning)

I hear rumblings that our ERP system is over-normalized.

Just curious,

Thanks!

Saira Somani
IT Support/Analyst
Hospital Logistics Inc.


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to