We are using the VA7100's and VA7400's.  They are several orders of
magnitude faster than the old 12H AutoRAID arrays if configured properly.
I'm no expert, but I know the VA7X00's combine some caching technology with
faster IO channels.

Scott Shafer
San Antonio, TX
210.581.6217


> -----Original Message-----
> From: david hill [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 4:56 PM
> To:   Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject:      RE: AUTORAID and VA7100 disk arrays for rp7400
> 
> Yep I have same thing to say 
> We have a HP N class with 3 HP AutoRaid's 
> I recently did a test to import our 50 gig database 
> On the HP it took 4 hours to do a Full export of DB and 12+ hours to
> import 
> I then proceeded to import the exact same dump file on a little Linux Xeon
> test box with IDE HD's just 2 120 Gig mirrored yes that right IDE.
> 
> And to import the full DB took 4 Hours!!! 
> Those IDE HD's cost $300 each 
> And those AutoRaids are costing us $1000 a month in support alone. 
> So we will soon changing out IO subsystem that  cost's a lot less, has
> more storage, and better performance. 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Vergara, Michael (TEM) [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 4:40 PM 
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
> Subject: RE: AUTORAID and VA7100 disk arrays for rp7400 
> 
> I'm not sure what a VA7100 is, so I don't want to tell you 
> to avoid it.  The AutoRaid I used just said "AutoRaid" on the 
> front.  It had 12 disks...I think they were 9G or 18G each. 
> It had only 96M of cache, not expandable.  Only 2 SCSI 
> channels - not expandable. 
> 
> What happened was that our whole database was on this array. 
> Yes, even on-line and archived redo logs.  The array did so 
> much internal thrashing that the disk response times were 
> abysmal. 
> 
> <RANT> 
> The boss got it cause he didn't want to pay the extra $$$ 
> for a 'real' array from EMC, Hitachi, or IBM.  It had the 
> magic word 'Raid' in the name so he went for it, and then 
> was all over me because the system was so slow.  I should'a 
> known what was up when a JBOD D-370 2-way did stuff faster 
> than our K570 6-way and the AutoRaid. 
> </RANT> 
> 
> Take my advice - don't go with an AutoRaid. 
> 
> Cheers, 
> Mike 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:45 PM 
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
> 
> 
> Michael, 
> 
> a dumb question. does this stops me from using VA7100 with 0+1 or are u
> talking about going some other disk array product?
> 
> Thanks 
> Mandar 
> 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: Vergara, Michael (TEM) [ <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:00 PM 
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
> > Subject: RE: AUTORAID and VA7100 disk arrays for rp7400 
> > 
> > 
> > Apologies to all for shouting, but ... 
> > 
> > DO NOT USE AUTORAID! 
> > ** *** *** ********* 
> > 
> > I used an AutoRaid system when I was at Petco.  Performance was 
> > el-sucko.  There was more I/Os happening in the disk array 
> > (by observing the disk lights) than was being caused by the 
> > application and database. 
> > 
> > Plus, when the AR system Raid 0+1/5 mode, where some blocks are 
> > kept in a RAID 0+1 area and some are kept in a RAID 5 area, the 
> > array got so busy swapping one for another that it was virtually 
> > useless. 
> > 
> > Fiber channel (FC-10) works ok, Clariion (by EMC) works Ok, 
> > heck, even JBOD works better than AutoRaid. 
> > 
> > Just my 2¢ worth. 
> > 
> > Cheers, 
> > Mike 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:35 AM 
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi, 
> > 
> > i am in the process of defining the specs for a rp7400. a lil 
> > overwhelmed by the storage offerings from HP. 
> > i wanted to know if any of ull hv any inputs regarding a disk array. 
> > we currently hv a Model 30/FC disk array with 9gig drives. 
> > I am looking for a similar or the next higher configuration 
> > disk array from HP. 
> > 
> > Any inputs regarding VA7100 disk array or corresponding 
> > competetive disk aray from HP/competitor? 
> > 
> > cache size 256/512/1024 MB? dont know which to go. 
> > thinking of going for 18GB 15k rpm rather than 36GB 15K rpm. 
> > faster smaller drives. 
> > 
> > the va7100 product specs on HP site mention more about 
> > AutoRAID (which is dynamic 0+1 or 5 configuration on the fly). 
> > any inputs on AutoRAID for Oracle database files. 
> > hv ull used 0+1 h/w configuration on VA7100? am i talking sense? 
> > 
> > a good article to read, especially page 4 
> > <http://www.hp.com/products1/storage/products/disk_arrays/infol> 
> ibrary/hp_va_and_san_virtualization.pdf 
> 
> 
> any inputs related to configuring a rp7400 are invited. my initial specs
> based on my current k570 is below. 
> 
> current k570 (7.3.4) 
> 4 * 200Mhz 
> 2 gn ram 
> 
> specs for rp7400 (8i/9i) 
> 4 * 550MHz 
> 6 Gb ram 
> 
> and i thought it was easy. 
> take a few procs 
> add ram 
> add few disks, 
> (Baaam!) make sound and license 
> and u hv a server. 
> 
> but look into a detailed partlist and configuration options at 
> <https://www.e-solutions.hp.com/shop/cgi-bin/sweetspot.cgi> 
> 
> 
> Thanks 
> Mandar 
> -- 
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: <http://www.orafaq.net> 
> -- 
> Author: Vergara, Michael (TEM) 
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 <http://www.fatcity.com> 
> San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message 
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in 
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L 
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may 
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: <http://www.orafaq.net> 
> -- 
> Author: Mandar A. Ghosalkar 
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 <http://www.fatcity.com> 
> San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message 
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in 
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L 
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may 
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). 
> 
> -- 
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: <http://www.orafaq.net> 
> -- 
> Author: Vergara, Michael (TEM) 
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 <http://www.fatcity.com> 
> San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message 
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in 
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L 
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may 
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). 
> 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to