Not an RDBMS bug -- it is the behavior of both your JDBC thin program as
well as SQL*Plus.  Every execute is preceded by a parse in SQL*Plus -- they
didn't write that utility with parsing efficiency as a primary goal.

Apparently, neither was the JDBC thin code...

----- Original Message -----
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:49 AM


> Dear friends,
>
> I traced one of our test cases and found something weird.
>
> Did anybody else observe this?
>
> Env:
> server - 9.0.1.4, Solaris.
> client - weblogic 7, uses original oracle thin 9.0.1 jdbc driver to
connect.
>          In fact, I can reproduce all this from SQLPlus
>
> Here is an excerpt from tkprof below - why every parse is a hard parse?
> Looks like the problem doesn't appear when 10046 is not set, and it appers
> ONLY on pl/sql blocks returning data to client, normal selects OK. Looks
> like bug again. Any workaround?
>
> And what are these "Misses in library cache during execute"?
>
> 9.2.0.2 on Linux works fine, i.e. no misses once it has been parsed.
>
>    BEGIN :1 := FN_GET_STATUS_ID(:2,:3); END;
>
>
>    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current
> rows
>    ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
> ----------
>    Parse       40      0.07       0.08          0          0          0
> 0
>    Execute     80      0.62       1.55         64       1492          0
> 80
>    Fetch        0      0.00       0.00          0          0          0
> 0
>    ------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
> ----------
>    total      120      0.69       1.63         64       1492          0
> 80
>
>    Misses in library cache during parse: 40
>    Misses in library cache during execute: 40
>    Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
>    Parsing user id: 40
>
> This select
>
>    select LOADED_VERSIONS, EXECUTIONS, LOADS,PARSE_CALLS, parsing_user_id
>    from v$sql
>    where sql_text like 'BEGIN :1 := FN_GET_STATUS_ID(:2,:3); END;';
>
> gives out whole bunch of these record groups
>
>    LOADED_VERSIONS EXECUTIONS      LOADS PARSE_CALLS PARSING_USER_ID
>    --------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------------
>               1          1          1           1              40
>               1          1          1           0              40
>    .... repeated N times
>
> Thank you for you time
>
> Vadim G
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> --
> Author: Gorbounov,Vadim
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
>

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Tim Gorman
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to