BEGIN :n := FNC_SP_GET_SUBID_BY_EXT_KEY (:v); END;
END OF STMT
PARSE #1:c=0,e=23499,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=1,r=0,dep=0,og=0,tim=1045147633021588
=====================
PARSING IN CURSOR #2 len=157 dep=1 uid=40 oct=3 lid=40 tim=1045147633074682 hv=1186233262 ad='5297e0dc'
SELECT SUB.sub_id
FROM SUB, REF_STATUS
WHERE SUB.sub_status_id = REF_STATUS.status_id
AND status != 'deleted'
AND SUB.external_key = :b1
END OF STMT
PARSE #2:c=0,e=151,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=1,og=4,tim=1045147633074659
EXEC #2:c=0,e=152,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=1,og=4,tim=1045147633075035
FETCH #2:c=0,e=529,p=0,cr=6,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=1,og=4,tim=1045147633075599
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 6 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
EXEC #1:c=20000,e=54001,p=0,cr=6,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=4,tim=1045147633075793
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 1132996 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
=====================
PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=50 dep=0 uid=40 oct=47 lid=40 tim=1045147634237789 hv=1118565285 ad='5416c120'
BEGIN :n := FNC_SP_GET_SUBID_BY_EXT_KEY (:v); END;
END OF STMT
PARSE #1:c=0,e=1339,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=1,r=0,dep=0,og=0,tim=1045147634237772
EXEC #2:c=0,e=99,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=1,og=4,tim=1045147634250940
FETCH #2:c=0,e=493,p=0,cr=6,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=1,og=4,tim=1045147634251548
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 5 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
EXEC #1:c=0,e=13751,p=0,cr=6,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=4,tim=1045147634251723
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 1374129 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
=====================
PARSING IN CURSOR #1 len=50 dep=0 uid=40 oct=47 lid=40 tim=1045147635660908 hv=1118565285 ad='5416c120'
BEGIN :n := FNC_SP_GET_SUBID_BY_EXT_KEY (:v); END;
END OF STMT
PARSE #1:c=0,e=1610,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=1,r=0,dep=0,og=0,tim=1045147635660892
EXEC #2:c=0,e=100,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=1,og=4,tim=1045147635700813
FETCH #2:c=0,e=508,p=0,cr=6,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=1,og=4,tim=1045147635701433
WAIT #1: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 5 p1=1413697536 p2=1 p3=0
EXEC #1:c=0,e=40510,p=0,cr=6,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=4,tim=1045147635701610
-----Original Message-----
From: Jamadagni, Rajendra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 1:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: 10046 trace - weird library missesI wonder if soft parsing applies to pl/sql blocks as it applies to just plain sql?? do you see the sql inside the function parsed less times compared to execute?Raj______________________________________________________Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!
-----Original Message-----
From: Gorbounov,Vadim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 11:39 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: 10046 trace - weird library missesRaj,It's not dynamic.From SQLPlus prompt it looks likeSQL> BEGIN :n := FNC_SP_GET_SUBID_BY_EXT_KEY (:v); END;
2 /Thank you,-----Original Message-----
From: Jamadagni, Rajendra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:44 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: 10046 trace - weird library missesAre you using dynamic sql? execute immediate? That might explain ... because exec immediate does a hard parse ... and it is documented too.
Raj
______________________________________________________
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't reflect that of ESPN Inc.
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, but having an opinion is an art!
-----Original Message-----
From: Gorbounov,Vadim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:49 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: 10046 trace - weird library misses
Dear friends,
I traced one of our test cases and found something weird.
Did anybody else observe this?
Env:
server - 9.0.1.4, Solaris.
client - weblogic 7, uses original oracle thin 9.0.1 jdbc driver to connect.
In fact, I can reproduce all this from SQLPlusHere is an excerpt from tkprof below - why every parse is a hard parse?
Looks like the problem doesn't appear when 10046 is not set, and it appers
ONLY on pl/sql blocks returning data to client, normal selects OK. Looks
like bug again. Any workaround?And what are these "Misses in library cache during execute"?
9.2.0.2 on Linux works fine, i.e. no misses once it has been parsed.
BEGIN :1 := FN_GET_STATUS_ID(:2,:3); END;
call count cpu elapsed disk query current
rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
----------
Parse 40 0.07 0.08 0 0 0
0
Execute 80 0.62 1.55 64 1492 0
80
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
0
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
----------
total 120 0.69 1.63 64 1492 0
80Misses in library cache during parse: 40
Misses in library cache during execute: 40
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 40This select
select LOADED_VERSIONS, EXECUTIONS, LOADS,PARSE_CALLS, parsing_user_id
from v$sql
where sql_text like 'BEGIN :1 := FN_GET_STATUS_ID(:2,:3); END;';gives out whole bunch of these record groups
LOADED_VERSIONS EXECUTIONS LOADS PARSE_CALLS PARSING_USER_ID
--------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------------
1 1 1 1 40
1 1 1 0 40
.... repeated N timesThank you for you time
Vadim G
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Gorbounov,Vadim
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
