Your answer was buried in the question itself. If the TEMP tablespace had to
contend with Tablespace C on the same 'disk' then such a result is expected.

John Kanagaraj
Oracle Applications DBA
DBSoft Inc
(W): 408-970-7002

What would you see if you were allowed to look back at your life at the end
of your journey in this earth?

** The opinions and statements above are entirely my own and not those of my
employer or clients **


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:41 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: direct path read waits
> 
> 
> All
> 
> We are doing some performance testing while moving from one server to
> another. I was trying to time some index rebuilds and noticed 
> something
> that I cant explain.
> 
> I am rebuilding an index on a 1 million row table.  Lets say its on
> tablespace A and when I rebuild it to tablespace B it does in 
> 33 seconds. I
> put it back on A and then rebuild it on tablespace C it takes 1 min 40
> seconds. The only change here is the target tablespace.
> 
> When I set 10046 level 12 and counted time waited (ela column)
> 
> From A - B (33 seconds)
> 
>      sum of elapsed in "DIRECT PATH READ" = 394 ( i think this is cs)
> 
> From A - C (1 min 40 sec)
> 
>      sum of elapsed in "DIRECT PATH READ" = 6251
> 
> The P1 of all of these waits point to the same file (#4 part of TEMP
> tablespace)
> 
> Why should the change in the target tablespace affect the 
> time taken to
> read from the TEMP tablespace?
> 
> TIA
> 
> Babu
> 
> _____________
> This e-mail transmission and any attachments to it are 
> intended solely for
> the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed 
> and may contain
> confidential and privileged information.  If you are not the intended
> recipient, your use, forwarding, printing, storing, disseminating,
> distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited.  If you
> received this communication in error, please notify the 
> sender immediately
> by replying to this message and delete it from your computer.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> -- 
> Author: 
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
> San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
> 
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: John Kanagaraj
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to